home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu.tar
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu
/
icon
/
newsgrp
/
group94b.txt
/
000071_icon-group-sender _Tue Oct 4 01:26:03 1994.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-02-09
|
9KB
Received: by cheltenham.cs.arizona.edu; Tue, 4 Oct 1994 05:36:37 MST
To: icon-group-l@cs.arizona.edu
Date: 4 Oct 1994 01:26:03 GMT
From: amarks@nella30.cc.monash.edu.au (Andy Marks)
Message-Id: <36qavb$9n3@harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au>
Organization: Monash University
Sender: icon-group-request@cs.arizona.edu
Subject: Error Message Questionnaire (Re-Post)
Errors-To: icon-group-errors@cs.arizona.edu
Error Message Questionnaire
===========================
Greetings,
--
NOTE: This questionnaire has been previously posted to this
newsgroup this year. If you have already replied, there is
no need to do so again. The re-posting is mainly for those
people who missed the first posting and US students who were
on summer holidays during the first posting.
If you prefer, there is also a WWW version of this question-
naire, which is a bit more user-friendly, and automatically
posts your answers back to me. The URL for the questionnaire
is:
"http://insect.sd.monash.edu.au/~amarks/questionnaire/question.html".
--
Here is your big chance to have a say about the quality of
those nasty little error messages that prevent us from
accomplishing our favorite task - programming! I am using
the results from this questionnaire in my research (for a
Masters by Research degree at Monash University) into error
messages and have posted this message to all Internet
newsgroups dealing with programming languages.
Although this posting might look quite large, relax - there
are only 7 questions in total, and the final one is complet-
ely optional: most of the questions are just picking options
from a list anyway, so it shouldn't take more than 10-15
minutes to complete.
If you would like your response to remain confidential,
please indicate this - otherwise you will be given a
"thanks" somewhere in my thesis (best I can do, sorry!).
Please email replies back to the original sender. If you are
NOT replying to this questionnaire through the news reader,
address your reply to "amarks@nellads.cc.monash.edu.au".
Also, please mark all answers on the original copy of the
questionnaire - as opposed to writing your answers in a
freeform manner, which will make collating the results a lot
more difficult and time-consuming.
When all responses have been collected, a summary of the
results will be posted back to each newsgroup. Then we'll
all be able to sleep safely with the knowledge that we all
make mistakes, and no-one is perfect! :-)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Section A: PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE BACKGROUND - these questions
will help me learn a little about the language you're
referring to in your answers. The term "this language"
refers to the one served by the newsgroup this questionnaire
appeared on. For example, if you got this questionnaire from
"comp.lang.apl", then "this language" refers to apl.
1a.Which programming language(s) are you referring to in
your answers?
ada dylan ml rexx
apl eiffel modula2 sas
asm forth modula3 sather
awk fortran oberon scheme
basic functional objective-c sigplan
visual-basic hermes pascal smalltalk
c icon perl tcl
c++ idl pop teco
cobol intercal postscript verilog
cfutures lisp prograph vhdl
clos logo prolog visual
clu misc python
(*) other:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
insert other language here, if applicable
(please mark ONE or MORE of these languages using a "*")
b. If applicable, please indicate below the particular
environment(s) of this language you use (for example,
Borland C++ versus Microsoft C++).
(*) environment:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
insert environment name(s) here
-----------------------------------------------------------
Section B: PROGRAMMER BACKGROUND - these questions will give
me some idea of your background and level of experience.
Programmer experience and background is reputedly one of the
most influential factors when dealing with error messages.
The term "this language" refers to the one selected in question
one.
3a.How many years have you been actively programming in this
language?
less than one year
1-2 years
3-5 years
5-10 years
more than ten years
(please mark ONE of these year ranges with a "*")
NOTE: By "actively programming", I mean consistent use of a particular
language on a regular basis. For example, usage for at least an hour
each day or a couple of hours each week, say, in the regime of a
course/degree/job of some sort.
b. Using the levels of experience below, how experienced
would you rate yourself in this language?
novice programmer
intermediate programmer
expert programmer
(*) other:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
insert other level of experience, if applicable
(please mark ONE of these levels with a "*")
NOTE: A "novice" programmer is still learning the language,
needs to refer to manuals frequently and is often
inefficient in using the language. An "intermediate"
programmer is comfortable with the language and is familiar
with most of/all of the commands of the language. An
"expert" programmer uses the language in the most efficient
way possible and spends time searching for better ways to
use the language.
4. Which other languages have you used? Please also indicate
your level of experience in each language you've used by
marking each one with a number indicating the number of
years you have been actively using the language. For
example, "3 c" would indicate three years experience in
the C language.
ada dylan ml rexx
apl eiffel modula2 sas
asm forth modula3 sather
awk fortran oberon scheme
basic functional objective-c sigplan
visual-basic hermes pascal smalltalk
c icon perl tcl
c++ idl pop teco
cobol intercal postscript verilog
cfutures lisp prograph vhdl
clos logo prolog visual
clu misc python
(*) other:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
insert other language here, if applicable
(please mark ONE or MORE of these languages with a number)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Section C: ERROR MESSAGES - these questions are the most
important part of the questionnaire; they will tell me how
you rate the quality of the error messages in this language.
By "error messages", I mean the messages generated by the
compiler/interpreter when your code is being compiled or
interpreted (probably due to a syntax violation), or at
run-time.
5. What is your general impression of the quality of error
messages in this language?
poor
below average
average
good
excellent
(please mark ONE of these levels of quality with a "*")
6. Using the kinds of problems below, how do you see the
error messages in this language being deficient?
obscure/vague in content
misleading in information
unfriendly in tone
unhelpful in removing error
jargonistic in wording
accusatory in tone
(*) other:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
insert other problem, if applicable
(please mark NONE/SOME/ALL of these problems with a "*")
-----------------------------------------------------------
Section D: OPTIONAL - only answer this question if you wish
to and can remember the wording of some of the error
messages in this language.
7. What are some of the most common error messages you
encounter in this language? (also indicate whether they are
satisfactory/unsatisfactory, and how you would improve them)
(>) --- (please put your answer below here)
(<) --- (please put your answer above here)
NOTE: The term "satisfactory/unsatisfactory" in the above
question refers to your opinion as to whether the error
message clearly indicates the source of the error and how to
remove the error.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for the time and effort spent in making your
contribution.
--
Andrew Marks (amarks@nellads.cc.monash.edu.au) IKKI!
Masters by Research (Software Development) IKKI!
Monash University, Caulfield IKKI!
<a href="http://insect.sd.monash.edu.au/~amarks/index.html">